1: Title page.
 2: Gluon fusion has the largest cross section at the LHC.
 3: Many discovery modes are based on gluon fusion...
 4: ...but we have seen channels come and go.
 5: For example, Higgs Strahlung, both at Tevatron and LHC.
 6: Fortunately, NNLO QCD and EW corrections for Higgs Strahlung are
    known.
 7: Gluon fusion: pros and cons.
 8: Heavy top limit in Gluon fusion: LO, naive application.
 9: Heavy top limit in Gluon fusion: NLO, factoring out LO mt-dependence
    - why does it work so well?
10: Gluon fusion cross section through NNLO: large corrections, but good
    convergence.
11: Effects of soft gluon resummation are small
    -> are they really the dominant source of radiative corrections?
12: pi^2 resummation - debated.
13: QCD corrections to gluon fusion - summary.
    Motivation for EW corrections.
14: EW corrections for gluon fusion.
15: QCD/EW corrections for gluon fusion: stricly valid only for Mh<Mw.
16: What goes into the Tevatron Higgs search?
17: Tevatron exclusion - and what it would look like at LO and NLO.
18: Same as 9.
19: Subleading terms in 1/mt - intro.
20: Example for asymptotic expansion of virtual 3-loop terms.
21: Example for asymptotic expansion of single real 2-loop terms.
22: Example for asymptotic expansion of double real 1-loop terms.
23: Soft expansion worked well already for leading term in 1/mt.
24: 1/mt expansion strictly works only for s-hat < 4*mt^2...
25: ... that's why the partonic cross section does not converge above
    threshold.
26: Fortunately, the exact large s-hat behaviour is known
    and we can construct a function that's valid for all s-hat.
27: Result of this matching, compared to exact s-dependence and
    to the soft expansion (NLO), on logarithmic and linear scale.
28: Same as 26, but for NNLO.
29: Same as 27, but for NNLO.
30: Comparison of 1/mt expansion (LO mass dependence is NOT factored out)
    for gg-channel at NLO to HIGLU - excellent convergence.
31: Comparison of 1/mt expansion (LO mass dependence is NOT factored out)
    for gg-channel at NNLO to heavy-top result (LO factored out)
    - excellent convergence.
32: Comparison of final result at NLO to HIGLU.
    The different lines correspond to various orders in the soft expansion
    - excellent convergence to exact result.
33: Similar to 32, but at NNLO, and comparison to heavy-top limit
    - excellent consistency
    (see R.Harlander and K.Ozeren, arxiv:0909.3420).
34: Conclusions on subleading terms:
    Heavy-top limit works to better than 0.5%.
    To be extended to differential quantities.
35: Gluon fusion is sensitive to the heavy particle spectrum.
36: SUSY-QCD corrections to the gluophobic Higgs do not change the 
    general pattern.
37: NLO SUSY-QCD corrections to gluon fusion: overview.
38: bb->H intro; collinear logarithms can be resummed by introducing
    bottom parton densities.
39: LO comparison of the 5-flavor-scheme (5-FNS, bb->H)
    to the 4-flavor-scheme (4-FNS, gg->bbH) description
    (plot from M. Kraemer).
    Agreement is found only for small factorization scales.
40: In the 5-FNS, the scale dependence becomes almost irrelevant once
    NNLO corrections are included. The perturbative behavior also
    suggests a low natural factorization scale.
41: Conclusions.